🔗 Share this article

The Evolution of a Cult can be characterized by distinct phases.

1. The Big Idea

An inspiring figure or leaders propose a new and transcendent idea that promises a cure for struggling players.

Thus we find ourselves. They’re getting ready to storm the compound in Australia. Tensions are rising. Signs of trouble appear from within. A lone figure, vulnerable, anxious, the slogan POSITIVE INTENT written on his body as a statement, has come staggering into view and is taken aside under a blanket for a temporary assignment elsewhere.

Do you recall the start, when the world was still young? The initial phase, of Bazball without brains.

2. The Honeymoon Phase

Cult leaders promise a new start, optimism ahead, camaraderie, salvation within a community united in belief in the big idea.

How did it feel at first? Just men on a balcony feeling good. Body art. Forearms. Jawlines. Elite male wellness energy. Of course, The squad insist it’s not a real term, which is funny as it’s denied, what exactly did I just watch?

Yet it’s clear what it is. It’s the batsman playing a shot so unconventional it’s beyond belief. It’s the excitement of the captain in his final form, an expression conveying: thoughtful warrior, rugged appearance, natural look, so authentically Modern Savage you almost imagine to look down and find him positioned at mid-off bare-chested holding a fish.

It’s Ben Duckett still being allowed speaking publicly, appearing as a happy little woodland creature smartly dressed, saying stuff like we’re breaking down traditions. Indeed, the energy, initially, was uplifting.

3. A New Life

Growth phase. Cohesion maintained through repetition of the cult’s slogans. These principles can appear contradictory as a test of “true belief”.

Am I alone? The criticism, the outrage, the feeling of letdown post-defeat appears excessive, unwarranted. England batted badly on the field, as is typical there. They were dominated defensively in a short span as plans unraveled, manipulated by the opponent batting like England but better, responsive to the situation, a man playing with brilliance.

Currently, we see the criticism, the rage, the perception of the team as a disgrace. The opinion suggests that England don’t just need to lose, they should be dismantled, to be purged, destroyed, defeated by the vengeful purity of the pace attack, the conventional tactics of the bowler, marking his wickets modestly similar to getting a rewarding prize. How will they respond?

4. External Conflict

Challenges surface due to setbacks. However, faults are ignored. It turns to hostility externally.

Ultimately, half a week out from the second Test, we’ve entered an intriguing moment in the lifespan of this movement. England could quite easily win overseas through aggressive play. More likely, they could lose just as quickly. In case of defeat it appears we could be witnessing the decline.

Before that happens, there are two things to consider about this. Previously, back in those heady early days, of light and heat, a column appeared labeling it a movement. There was outrage, which was helpful as it’s known the best way of proving that it’s not a closed group is if supporters react defensively rejecting criticism of the philosophy.

Recent events lately are equally notable. Criticism of the approach has turned into a movement. We have a uniformly angry internet, angry English pundits, shots of angry middle-aged followers overseas missing out on play, similar to timeshare owners seeking justice.

Meanwhile, there is the broader context of Australia’s more nuanced deep-seated frustration towards the unconventional visitors, claiming, the methods you value and have developed as part of your identity from the opposition, it’s not serious ultimately.

And this is the real point. All movements are similar. The style was a trend because cricket is a cult. Or at least, English cricket has always been a cult, a group, an elite gathering, a closed world with centuries of opaque and ritualistic cult history behind it. It has long been where influence is guarded. It’s the colonial game of the nation, the early image-makers. And notably, the nation has its own culture, a structure of hidden ranks, a royal family remains.

The players have been sealed up in this system for years. In trying to escape from it, to create a less brutal environment, they are just repeating their upbringing, building another enclosure, an exclusive group, but doing it this time with a modern squad and a leader who wants you to be yourself as long as yourself is quite a lot like myself.

Live where your feet are. Confront risks. However much you change, things stay similar.

Considering this, it might be appropriate to have some sympathy for the movement, to acknowledge its merits, which are significant. What is Bazball? Encouraging expression. Defying norms. Batting aggressively|Attacking with